What does Schlesinger argue about the centralization of power in the presidency?

What does Schlesinger argue about the centralization of power in the presidency?

• A. It is essential for maintaining a balance of power
• B. It can be dangerous and undermines constitutional order
• C. It reflects an efficient government structure
• D. It is necessary for effective foreign policy management

Answer: (B)

Schlesinger argues that the centralization of power in the presidency can be dangerous and undermines constitutional order. He views the concentration of power in the executive branch as a threat to democratic principles and the system of checks and balances established by the Constitution. This centralization can lead to an overreach of executive authority, diminishing the role of other branches of government and potentially leading to authoritarianism. Schlesinger’s perspective emphasizes the importance of maintaining a distribution of power to safeguard democratic governance and prevent abuses that might arise from an unchecked presidency.

Schlesinger argues that the centralization of power in the presidency can be dangerous and undermines constitutional order. He views the concentration of power in the executive branch as a threat to democratic principles and the system of checks and balances established by the Constitution. This centralization can lead to an overreach of executive authority, diminishing the role of other branches of government and potentially leading to authoritarianism. Schlesinger’s perspective emphasizes the importance of maintaining a distribution of power to safeguard democratic governance and prevent abuses that might arise from an unchecked presidency.